SECTION FOUR

sm
COLUMN NINETY-FOUR, JULY 1, 2003
(Copyright 2003 The Blacklisted Journalist)

QUESTIONS LINGER OVER THE WTC COLLAPSE

This is the story of how at least one engineering expert was impeded in his attempt to understand the all-too-easy collapse of the World Trade Center Towers.

In the national outpouring of generous responses after September 11, 2001, the National Science Foundation awarded eight Quick Response Research Awards to study the attack sites:

'the data will be used in engineering studies to help improve the structural integrity of the nation's buildings, utilities and other infrastructure during fires, earthquakes, explosions and other hazards. They will also be used to improve the nation's response to such threats."  (http://www.nsf.gov/search97cgi/vtopic)

Any scholar who has wended the labyrinth of academic grant-making can appreciate the speed with which these NSF grants were awarded, within days of the attacks.

One highly qualified awardee is Professor Abolhassan Astaneh-Asl, in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of California.  Astaneh's engineering credentials


The steel debris from the WTC
was recycled before it could be studied


aside from degrees and certifications include 150 publications, memberships in the chief professional associations, and twenty years of university/professional teaching.  (www.ce.berkeley.edu/~astaneh)  It probably helps to have the West Coast's ample opportunities for seismic investigation. 

The research goal for Astaneh's team was to save as much "perishable data? from debris at the World Trade Center as possible, and to inspect as much of the steel structure and as many pieces as possible. 

Unfortunately, something got in the way, and it wasn't further attacks.  Under orders from authorities, tons of debris were removed from the Center and recycled too swiftly to permit study, a move that still has not been reviewed. 

In a congressional hearing on March 6, 2002, Astaneh testified that the engineering research was also impeded in other ways.  In response to a question from the House Committee on Science, Astaneh stated that he was not given copies of the engineering, design and construction documents for the Center, and he was not given copies of photographs and videotapes taken by government agencies immediately after the buildings? collapse.  'such data," he said, "are already available to ASCE Building Performance Assessment Team.  If those are also available to us, we will be able to proceed further with our research." 

Astaneh's painstaking work is something of a rebuke to simplistic conspiracy theories about the WTC collapse.  As he says in response to emailed questions, "Obviously no one knows what the terrorists had in mind . . . we need some data to form a hypothesis." 

However, Astaneh continues, "I felt that most likely [the skyjackers] did not know much about the unique structural system used in WTC towers which was [an] outside tube made of numerous columns made of thin plate which resulted in the planes cutting through them easily and entering the building." 

The professor surmises, 'since they most likely did not know about this, their attempt was to hit the building with the inertia force of large jetliner to topple it laterally which could fall on the surrounding financial area buildings including [the] Stock Exchange. I did not then and I do not now believe that anyone could have come up with a plan to destroy the towers the way it happened: the planes entering the building easily, destroying the core elevator/stair shafts, trapping upper floor occupants, starting a fire throughout the large floor area, weakening the columns and floor joists and collapsing the towers completely."

Given some ludicrous "demolitions? notions floating around that unnamed culprits planted explosives inside the WTC buildings, Astaneh's genuine investigations would seem highly valuable.  Professor Astaneh has already worked off his obligation to the taxpayer by giving at least fifteen public and professional presentations on the WTC.  By any respectable criterion, the research deserves recognition.

On the broader topics, engineering has to be buttressed by history.  (A good history of hijackings is provided at www.saag.org/papers2/paper3.html.)  If research suggests that the skyjackers were trying to hit the stock market, a reasonable assumption is that the fourth plane was headed to hit the Pentagon.  No surprise there:  the attack symmetry of two planes for the Pentagon, two planes for the Stock Exchange fits in with recent strikes in other countries.

It has been apparent since September 2001 that these criminally-instigated young males were technologically proficient in some ways but had only a primitive understanding of their targets.

Only further investigation can reveal whether the fiends who financed the attack were equally unaware.  Perhaps the attackers thought they actually had a shot at taking out the Pentagon and the US stock market, while the people who paid their way knew they couldn't.  ##

CLICK HERE TO GET TO INDEX OF COLUMN NINETY-FOUR


CLICK HERE TO GET TO INDEX OF COLUMNS

The Blacklisted Journalist can be contacted at P.O.Box 964, Elizabeth, NJ 07208-0964
The Blacklisted Journalist's E-Mail Address:
info@blacklistedjournalist.com
 
 

THE BLACKLISTED JOURNALIST IS A SERVICE MARK OF AL ARONOWITZ